Achieving Circularity Through Composting and Biopolymers

The Need for Proper Handling of Compostable Alternatives in the RRC Triad


In my previous post, “Why Achieving Reusable, Recyclable, or Compostable (RRC) Targets Are Being Missed”, I emphasized,  as reported by the Ellen McArthur Global Commitment 2022 Progress Report that “Compostable” in the RRC triad (Recyclable, Reusable, Compostable),  has been for the most part ignored by major brands (0% out of 65% compliance progress).  It’s obviously clear that it is easier for brands to report on the recyclability of its packaging, even though they do not bear any responsibility for their “recyclable” packaging to be actually recycled.  Producing recyclable products is just the first step in achieving circularity, but much more needs to be done for the recyclable product to be recycled and then to return that recycled material into productive use.  If the subsequent steps are not achieved, any benefit of recyclable products will never be realized.  More than that, such recyclable material will become a major pollutant.  That is where we are today.  

conventional plastics vs bioplastics

Click image to enlarge

However, not all is lost.  Composting, the “C” in RRC, represents a fundamentally different paradigm, with Bio-Polymers presenting a completely different alternative.

avoid single use plastic

Click image to enlarge

Circularity of both conventional polymers and biopolymers can be achieved, if handled properly through the collection and processing infrastructure and appropriate recycling technologies.  Of these,  biopolymers represent less risk of plastic contamination and pollution, especially with respect to product “leakage” into the environment.

It should be noted however, that not all biopolymers are created equally, and their potential impact on the environment strongly depends on their ability to degrade, and the conditions necessary to achieve a complete or near-complete degradation, along with the residual impact on the environment.  There is also an important consideration related to the recyclability of products made from biopolymers.  Not all such bio-based polymers can be effectively recycled.

Existing classification of biopolymers traditionally distinguishes between bio-based polymers (those derived from bio-based sources) and bio-degradable (those that can be composted under various conditions).  Bio-based polymers that are not compostable/degradable are equally as harmful as conventional plastics when spilled into the environment.  A well known example of a product made from bio-based polymers is the “plant bottle”.  Even though the PET used in the production of these bottles was bio-based, in the end, these bottles were no different from PET bottles produced from hydrocarbons, and they pollute the environment in exactly the same way, if not recycled properly.   They also result in the same amount of microplastics discharged into the environment as any traditionally produced plastic bottle.

Biopolymers: A Promising Alternative for Achieving Circularity in Plastic Packaging

problematic plastic packaging

Click image to enlarge

Understanding the Role of Composting and Bio-Based, Compostable Polymers in Sustainable Packaging

At present, there are several groups of bio-based, bio-degradable materials that satisfy the conditions of “Compostable” in RRC that provide the biggest positive impact in meeting the sustainability goals of major brands.  Polyhydroxyalkaonates (PHAs) is a group of bio-based materials that emerge as the most promising, with a wide variety of physical and mechanical properties that can replace conventional plastics in several applications where non-recyclable plastics currently dominate.  We believe that PHAs are closer than any other compostable alternative to meeting three key elements of viability, described in the previous post: (1) availability of functional solutions, (2) economics and scalability of these solutions, and (3) availability of infrastructure and regulatory support.  Currently, there are only a few PHA-based products offered in the marketplace. There is much more that needs to be done to create a meaningful presence of compostable packaging on the shelves of our stores.

post-consumer recycled content

Click image to enlarge

It should be emphasized that PHA-based products, or other products made from bio-based, compostable polymers are NOT supposed to fully replace conventionally produced and properly recycled plastics.  For example, beverage containers made from recycled PET are the most efficient way to achieve circularity in that segment of packaging.  PET containers are easily recycled and the respective infrastructure exists and continues to grow.  Effective technologies exist to convert post-consumer PET into material perfectly suitable for the majority of regular applications.  At the same time, many other polymers are NOT recycled and that contributes to the overall negative view of plastics as a major pollutant (actual recycling rate of 9% for all polymers does not help).  While it is highly unlikely that PHA can replace all non-compostable polymers, it is definitely a great first step in achieving circularity in a sizeable segment of plastic packaging products that are currently NOT recycled and end up in landfills and waterways, while shedding substantial amount of microplastics in the process.

Our next post will be devoted to describing specific products that we believe can be economically produced from PHA, and our recommendations for the most efficient path forward to that objective.


About the Author

Alexander Delnik

Alexander Delnik is a seasoned professional with close to 20 years of experience in plastics recycling, material circularity, and related regulatory policies. His expertise spans from the development of PET recycling technologies to the creation of innovative enterprises that promote circular economy in plastics and plastics packaging. What he is most passionate about is promoting innovative solutions and products that can improve the quality of life.

Throughout his career, Delnik has built successful companies and developed business models that identified key success factors for building a sustainable recycling model. He strongly believes that responsible use of plastics, including assuring circularity of plastic products, is becoming the norm. He advocates for effective plastic recycling, responsible material compostable materials, and all solutions to eliminate pollution while allowing us to benefit from the tremendous opportunities that biopolymers offer.

Delnik is particularly excited about initiating legitimate and honest conversations about hot topics such as plastic bans and replacing plastics with other products. He encourages an informed and objective discussion on how plastics participate in our lives, lifting the conversation beyond catchphrases, sensational screen shots, and emotional outbursts. He aims to compare recycled, reused, and composted solutions, evaluating their impacts and abilities, as well as end-of-life solutions, and the impact if they are not composted.

Delnik's accomplishments are many, and he has a long history of building successful enterprises, but he prefers to promote his overall experience and concepts over his history. His ultimate goal is to help move beyond the sensationalism surrounding the plastics industry and to have an informed conversation about how we can improve the quality of life while reducing plastic waste.